Filed under: advertising, marketing | Tags: advertising, bp, dawn, dish soap, gulf, marketing, oil clean up, oil spill, procter and gamble, wildlife
So by now everyone has heard of what is going on in the Gulf of Mexico.
BP. Oil. Craziness.
Interestingly enough, Dawn dish soap has previously foraged into responsible marketing in the form of promoting the fact that its dish soap is used to clean off some of the wildlife that has been affected by oil. Dawn would donate money from every bottle purchased to help a cause – the classic concept that has already been championed by brands like Toms and GAP.
So here’s some questions to ask – is cause marketing another attempt to try and build brand equity? Maybe. Are companies jumping on the bandwagon simply to be another me-too? Definitely. Does it always work? Not really.
In this case, however, the campaign works wonders.
Is this spot brilliant? Maybe.
Rather than simply slapping on a cause such as supporting Susan G. Komen or Livestrong, the marketers at Dawn had actively chosen to support a cause which utilized their product as well.
Given the turn of events that have happened recently, it would be interesting to see how Dawn sales have been affected.
Now before you say anything, the discussion isn’t centered around exploiting a natural disaster – but using it to educate consumers that Dawn is a responsible brand. Great way to build equity. And with the whole situation in the Gulf, consumers will now be able to associate Dawn with the cleanup effort – that the brand they bought has helped clean the slick.
Will people think twice in the dish soap aisle? You bet.
Let’s just hope that the dawnsaveswildlife.com cause can last for longer than the $500,000 that is the ceiling of the campaign.
Filed under: advertising, marketing | Tags: 2009, advertising, big ant international, clios, d&ad awards, non profit, pro bono, what goes around comes around
As technology races forward, we are constantly looking for new, cutting edge ways to pass messages along to the consumer. It seems that nowadays, if you’re not online, mobile or viral, then you are lagging behind the pack.
There are still, however, plenty of opportunities in our advertising world to break out and push the limits with what is available around us. And without the big budgets that some of the larger advertisers are packing. This includes non-profits, for which many shops do pro-bono work.
A campaign that has made headlines in the ad world (and award shows) is a recent outdoor series from Big Ant International, a boutique shop in New York City started in 2006 by SVA grads. With an impressive client list to their name, the shop has managed to really blow one out of the park with the recent “What Goes Around Comes Around” posters.
Designed as posters that wrap around concrete poles, the brilliance behind the concept is its simplicity. The continuous image speaks larger than most words, and the included copy solidifies the message, hammering home the point that like a circle, a war sees no end.
Check these out:
Filed under: advertising, marketing | Tags: advertising, audi, billboards, bmw, marketing
Many of you have probably seen this floating around the Internet in the last few days, but I felt the need to post it here and show it again.
With the way techonology’s been advancing the last few years, people have turned away from some of the more traditional forms of advertising – billboards, radio etc.
Audi and BMW in Santa Monica took it up a notch in this butting of heads on neighboring billboards. Brilliant.
Filed under: advertising, marketing | Tags: advertising, brand, brandjacking, burger king, christopher walken, hijack, marketing, twitter
New contribution to Respinning The Web:
Identity theft has been threatening society for years, and now this battle has become an issue for brands on the internet.
A few weeks ago I was following two different characters on Twitter – TheBKLounge and CWalken. The way both accounts were set up, followers were lead to believe that The Burger King and Christopher Walken were on the other end of the wire. Both accounts were, however, revealed to be false and the owners fessed up to their exploits (Caleb Kramer even wrote a post about it).
Filed under: advertising, marketing | Tags: advertising, bad, comcast, good, joe's crab shack, marketing, microsoft, ugly
The Good – Microsoft “Kylie”
One of the most recalled commercials so far in 2009 (Crispin had 2 or 3 of them in the top 10) this endearing spot is heartwarming and informative. Crispin is rebranding Microsoft not as the direct competitor to Apple, who have cornered the teen/college market, but as the easy to use family personal computer. Taking a step away from those terrible spots with Gates and Seinfeld, they’ve put together something that is both cute and brilliant at the same time. Bonus points to Crispin – not that they need any more.
The Bad – Comcast “Slowskys”
Definitely not as creative as the last batch of commercials coming from the cable provider, this spot is extremely literal. How do we represent slow? Choose the turtle. What do we have him do? Something fast. Oh yes, and he’s dreaming while waiting for something to load. Simple formula, which is why the spot gets is bad. Too simple. It gets old extremely quickly, and the extremely literal references don’t do the service any justice. Instead of making these cheesy spots I suggest two things. 1. Be a little more creative. 2. Actually work on your customer service.
The Ugly – Joe’s Crab Shack “Take your top off”
Oh yes, the crème de la crème of cheese. Seeing this spot a few weeks ago was quite disturbing. Not in a disgusting sense, but disturbing in the fact that Joe’s Crab Shack, a family chain, is alluding to “taking the top off”. Not only is the middle school humor inappropriate for the target audience (some parents may be turned off by this), but for the audience it is targeting (upper teens – lower 20’s) it is just lame, cheesy and actually not funny at all. Another example of a creative team that tried too hard to be “cool” and missed the goal altogether.
What do you think?
Filed under: advertising, marketing | Tags: advertising, arnell, marketing, pepsi, refresh everything, tropicana
Quite often consumers today feel that companies are pushing their products onto them incessantly. The internet was essentially a refuge from the millions of advertising images seen each day, something that is no longer the case. One thing that the consumer really under-estimates is their true power in the equation of the brand.
Pepsi’s recent rebranding campaign brought mixed reviews from its customers – some agreeing with the changes, while others not agreeing with them at all. Having “refreshed” the packaging for its entire line of sodas, juices and Gatorade, Pepsi had seemingly stepped on hallowed ground with its brand.
Last week, Peter Arnell, CEO of Arnell Group – the company in charge of the rebranding, announced that the Tropicana juice packaging would return to its former design after much scrutiny and complaints from the consumer.
The new design, a glass of juice, focuses on the contents of the box. It is crisp and clean (I actually like it), and the cap is made to look like an orange. Arnell mentioned that the “squeezing” of the cap is to induce images of squeezing the orange. It seems that this overanalyzes people’s fascination with orange juice – there aren’t too many people in the world who are capable of squeezing oranges with just two fingers. This tactile branding attempt might have also been a little better accepted had people actually squeezed fresh orange juice for themselves in the past. Though vehemently defended by Arnell and his group (they were paid big bucks for this), the change was still made.
Customers, yearned for the old design. The image of the orange with the straw, a refreshing package design that may not be as chic and trendy, poses a message that hits home – Tropicana Juice is so natural it is like placing a straw in an orange. And in the consumer’s eyes, this knocked the static image of the glass with juice out of the water. The fresh orange beat the refreshed orange juice.
Plenty of situations like this have happened in the past, and failed rebranding, particulary with old, historical brands, will continue to occur in the future. New Coke of the 90’s, anyone?